Arthur H. Manners

Award-winning author of speculative fiction

You are here: Home / Archives for Blog

Blog

New story: Nelly’s World, published in Divergent Realms

I’m pleased to announce that my sci-fi short story “Nelly’s World” will appear in the upcoming 2024 anthology “Divergent Realms: Speculative Stories About Neurodiversity”.

The story marks my fourth short story sale, but “Nelly’s World” stands out as special to me. It was the first story I wrote that I considered a “proper short story”, the first time I felt like I’d succeeded. It’s taken several years to sell after many near misses, but I couldn’t be happier with the home it’s found.

The editor of the anthology, Riley Odell, is himself a horror writer. He took part in an interview about the anthology over at Stark Reflections, in which he talks about his work, the anthology, his neurodivergent identity, and the need for representation of neurodiversity in fiction.

The anthology is scheduled for release in Spring 2024. More updates to come.

Story Submissions in 2023

(This post was inspired by similar posts over at Aeryn Rudel’s excellent site, Rejectomancy. I recommended his articles about his writing journey—and his cool stories, of course.)

2023 was the first year I put serious effort into submitting short stories to markets for publication. I had sent out the odd sub every other year since 2011/2012ish, but I always gave up after a few tries (oh, sweet summer child, who thought a single rejection meant they’d never be good enough to be published). Short stories aren’t my natural writing form. I find novels much easier, and a lot of my early short stories (and some now, if I’m not paying attention) are essentially compressed novels.

Shaky Start: 2021-2022

In 2021 I wrote two stories after a long break from writing, with no real intention to do anything with them. In 2023, I focused on learning by doing and failing and doing again. They both sold in the end (one in 2022, one in 2023), but I was submitting in a very slapdash and ad-hoc way.

2022 was a bad year in my personal life, so any steam from 2021 fell flat. I wrote three short stories. (I might do a separate post on this, because I almost just gave up altogether.) In short: I put out 24 submissions and got 23 rejections (20 form, 3 personal). One of them ended up winning 2nd-place in the Writers of the Future contest, which was so surprising that I thought I was being cold-called by the competition runner and almost put the phone down on her.

Only in 2023 did I get my head on straight and start writing again in earnest. So, let’s look into how it went.

Shout-out to Angela Liu: I was hesitant to put something like this together, at least partly because I didn’t know if I’d like the stats if I computed them. One thing that finally got me motivated was Angela Liu’s retrospective on her first year of submissions. Angela came screaming out of the gate in 2023, getting 12 stories published, more than half in very prestigious places. If you don’t read on from here, at least follow that link. While you’re at it, do yourself another favour: read her work. It’s really, really good.

Stories Written

This year, I wrote 14 complete stories and an additional 3 partials. 2 of those stories sold, 9 are still out on active submission, I retired 1 (it was just so, so bad), and parked 2 for further work later. The average story length was ~5,000 words with a standard deviation of ~2,000 words (meaning 2/3 of my stories fell in the range 3,000-7,000 words). In total, it mounted up to 66,350 words of finished drafts (x2-4 for redrafting, in some cases almost total rewrites).

I also completed an ~88,000 word sci-fi novel, which is now on submission.

All told, that adds up to ~154,000 words of polished prose. Not bad, probably around average for me, but certainly an enormous swing towards short fiction when compared to previous years .

Submission Stats

The statistics look like this:

  • Submissions: 68
  • Ongoing (at the time of writing, 26th Jan 2024): 11
  • Withdrawn: 2
  • Rejections (form): 41
  • Rejections (personal): 8
  • Never responded: 3
  • Acceptances: 3

Discounting the ongoing subs, that’s a 5.2% acceptance rate, or 1 out of every 19 submissions. I’m happy with that, given my “top-down” approach (i.e., starting with top-rate places like Clarkesworld, Asimov’s, etc. and working down to lower-paying / less prestigious markets). My sales were to pro and semi-pro markets, in the pay range $0.06-0.08 p/w, at or just below the current SFWA-recommended professional rates.

Further encouraging is an 14% chance of getting a personal rejection, a hat-tip from the editor that means “close but not quite” or “not this time, but send me something else”. If we’re counting that as a kind of win, we’re talking a 19.2% rate of success this year.

If we’re being cheeky and discounting the withdrawals (hastily done after I realised some double submission mistakes after switching from Duotrope to Submission Grinder) and those who never responded, the rate tick up a little more to 5.8% and 15.3%, respectively.

Lessons Learned

One lesson I did learn this year was to stay away from writing specifically for anthology calls. With a mind to get as many stories in the air as possible—a sort of hit-the-ground-running mentality—I wrote 6 stories for themed contests/anthologies, almost half my output.

I hoped the prompts would boost my productivity. And they did, but at a cost. While one of those stories sold to a great market and I’m very proud of it, the others ranged from “needs a LOT of work” to “this might be the worst pile of crap I’ve ever written”.

The novel I also wrote for a competition, which ate up my whole summer. Unfortunately it didn’t make the shortlist, and time constraints meant I made changes to my original vision for the story.

Why did these projects come out so badly? I think a combination of two factors:

  1. Hofstadter’s Law: “A project always takes longer than you expect, even if you account for Hofstadter’s Law”. I’ve discovered that, despite being known in my family for my time management skills, I’m rubbish at gauging how long a story will take to finish. I mean, off by a factor of 2-3. Inexperience? Optimism? Both, probably. Anyway, I squeezed my stories into anthology/contest deadlines by minutes on several occasions, and to be honest the stories were just not polished enough to be competitive.
  2. I don’t really enjoy being prompted. By nature, I’m the “silent contrarian” type, that irritating kind of bastard that hates being told what to do, but also doesn’t like conflict—so they disobey in such a way that nobody notices until it’s too late. I’ve completed enough “creative prompt” classes/exercises/textbooks to know that, while they’re essential for honing your craft and learning the ropes, for me they rarely kickstart any ideas with legs.

Regardless, going forward, I plan to stay away from themed anthologies, unless I happen to already have either a good idea or a finished story lying around that fits.

Vision vs What Appears on the Page

TL;DR: Confident in a story I intended to submit to a prestigious market, I sent it out to beta readers for a final glance-over. One reader ever so politely informed me that it was a steaming pile of crap, and they were totally right. Lesson: your vision often disagrees with what you actually wrote, sometimes to disastrous extent. (And thank the timeless void for beta readers.)

Last year, I worked on a horror short story on-and-off for about four months. In that time, I put in perhaps a week’s equivalent of writing time. I sent it out to an anthology around November and recently received a rejection.

No problem, I thought. Rare is the story that sells the first time. I put it aside and decided to come back to it when I had a break in my schedule.

Only a few weeks later, a call came for submissions from a prestigious market. A great fit for the story. I eagerly fished the story from my files, dusted it off and gave it a glance over, and decided that it was much better than I remembered. It was actually quite good. Always a nice surprise for a writer looking back over their own work.

I asked two people to read it first, just to be sure I wasn’t missing anything silly. One of them enjoyed it and offered minor structural tweaks and suggestions to strengthen the characterisation.

I incorporated the changes and waited for the second reader’s feedback. My finger hovered over the submit button; I expected minor suggestions, if any. The feedback came: the most polite but complete trashing I’ve yet received. I was blindsided, first by simple surprise, then by the realisation that they were absolutely right.

The story didn’t work at all. It was flawed in multiple aspects that required a complete overhaul.

And I’d been so sure that it was good, that it was ready. Without that person’s input to shock me out of my anchored perspective, I would have flung the story into the slush pile with no hope of a sale.

It was a lesson in humility: I may have written a number of novels, but I am still learning the short story form. It was also a lesson in the resilience of a warped perspective; I knew all of the things my second reader pointed out — why hadn’t I noticed and fixed them long before the beta-reading stage?

Because I had been blinded by the original inspiration for the story. The vision had occluded the words that had actually made it onto the page. This usually happens to some degree with every story, especially with line-edits: you don’t see the missing ‘the’ because you meant to write it and reading over the story yet again only stimulates your memory of what you intended the story to be. My the craziness of my schedule no doubt contributed to my seeing-but-not-seeing.

But this episode stands out. No amount of practice makes a person immune to the skewing effect of their perceptions.

Outcome: I’ve overhauled the story, top to bottom. And it’s much stronger. Blessings be to all beta readers.

Upcoming story: Empty Nest, published by Dreamforge Anvil

I’m delighted to say that I’ve recently signed a contract with Dreamforge for my short story “Empty Nest”. The story will feature in their 2024 double-issue on “uplift“. What’s it about? Androids, genetic engineering and cuttlefish. Sort of.

I enjoyed writing this story more than most, and I’m proud to see it find a home with a great publisher. I’ll provide an update when the story becomes available.